Armstrong Rigg Planning News

1
2
3

08 Oct 2019

Milton Keynes Housing Land Supply Appeal Decision

In allowing an appeal against Milton Keynes Council’s refusal for 50 homes at Castlethorpe Road in the village of Hanslope, a planning inspector has concluded that the local authority did not provide the clear evidence necessary to support its housing land supply position in excess of five years just six months after it adopted its new local plan. The Council has since confirmed that as there is significant contradiction between this decision and other received recently, it will be seeking legal advice on the matter. The appeal decision can be found here: file:///C:/Users/emily.warner/Downloads/ED32_Appeal_A__APPY0435W183214365_Land_off_Castlethorpe_Road__Hanslope_MK19_7HQ.pdf

 

31 Jul 2019

Key changes to National Planning Practice Guidance that you should be aware of

With very little fanfare the Government have recently made a number of substantial changes to Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) with some of them expected to prove fairly fundamental when interpreting the intentions of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in particular. We consider the key changes to be as follows:

  •  A new short section on Green Belt. This provides advice on two specific issues. The first is what should be considered when assessing openness introducing new themes relating to perceptions of openness and urbanisation. The second issue covered is the nature of compensatory measures appropriate to justify the removal of land from the Green Belt during plan making.
  • Extensive guidance on housing land supply. This pulls together the relevant strands of case law, existing guidance, technical notes and the NPPF into one comprehensive rule book. It covers matters in respect of the definition of deliverability, what can be included in a Council’s supply, how to calculate and apply buffers and a lengthy sub-section explaining how Councils can fix their housing land supply for a year. Some of the points of clarification confirm the following:
    • The types of evidence that Councils can rely on to demonstrate deliverability. This paragraph includes a recommendation that the HELAA should be used as an opportunity to demonstrate the deliverability of sites, especially in the urban area;
    • The detail of how a Council should set about fixing their 5YHLS position for a period of a year. Where a local authority seeks to rely on the trajectory of a recently adopted local plan it must include at least a 10% uplift on its housing need to be considered robust;
    • A minimum list of parties who should be engaged to allow an Inspector to confirm and ‘fix’ a Council’s housing land supply position. This includes all landowners and promoters with an interest in the sites to be included in the trajectory;
    • In areas covered by a Joint Plan its strategic policies should be clear in setting out whether housing monitoring and the assessment of supply is to be done on a District by District basis, an urban rural basis or across the whole plan area;
    • In respect of housing delivery, it explains the required extent of Action Plans for authorities falling under 95% of their delivery target.
  • A short section on effective use of land. This includes the explanation of circumstances where the development of an allocated site with an alternative use could be justified – this should be led by evidence demonstrating some or all of any failed marketing, lack of need, change of circumstances (e.g. market trends). It also clarifies the types of sites where higher densities could be justified.
  • Housing needs for different groups. This section emphasises the high-level nature of the Local Housing Need figure and that a SHMA will still likely be required to assess the needs of specific groups, unit size etc. A new paragraph also solidifies previous Government advice that blanket policies restricting housing in rural villages will require clear justification.

The updates include changes to 15 further sections of the PPG including a clearer set of rules for the ‘agent of change’ in instances where there will be noise impact, a clearer methodology on how Council’s should assess the availability of housing sites as part of the local plan process and guidance on how to identify needs for strategic uses such as logistics.

If you would like to discuss and of the changes to the PPG, highlighted above or otherwise, we would be pleased to assist.

24 May 2019

An extension of permitted development rights will come into force on 25th May

The legislation creates a new class, JA of the GPDO to allow proposals for the conversion of shops and other high street uses to B1 offices under the prior approval process. Class M already allows retail and sui generis uses to be converted to residential without the need for planning permission, but the new regulations would allow takeaways to also be converted to housing.

The regulations also makes permanent the existing temporary right to enlarge a dwellinghouse by up to 8 metres in the case of a detached dwellinghouse or by 6 metres in the case of any other dwellinghouse removing the time limiting date of 30th May 2019, as well as conditions which required development to be completed by that date.

 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/907/pdfs/uksi_20190907_en.pdf

 

19 Feb 2019

Updated National Planning Policy Framework 2019

Following from last year’s Technical Consultation on Updates to National Planning Policy and Guidance, an updated NPPF was published on the 19th February 2019. This document replaces the first NPPF published in March 2012 and includes minor clarifications to the revised version published in July 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2

The changes to the Framework are minor in respect of wording – three in total – but follow through on the Technical Consultation’s intent to clarify, remove ambiguity and close some of the potential loopholes that existed in respect of the application of policy.

The amendments are as follows:

Section 5: Delivering a sufficient supply of homes

Footnote 37 has been amended. This relates to instances where, when calculating a Council’s 5-year supply, the strategic policies of the development plan are over 5 years old and the local need figure should be used. The footnote now includes the following line:

“Where local housing need is used as the basis for assessing whether a five-year supply of specific deliverable sites exists, it should be calculated using the standard method set out in national planning guidance.”

As a companion to this amendment the definition of ‘Local Housing Need’ has also been updated in the Glossary. It now reads:

“The number of homes identified as being needed through the application of the standard method set out in national planning guidance (or, in the context of preparing strategic policies only, this may be calculated using a justified alternative approach as provided for in paragraph 60 of this Framework).”

Combined, these changes are intended to end the debate around whether an additional means of calculating a Council’s annual requirement (i.e. a draft SHMA) can be used when undertaking their 5 year land supply assessments when their strategic policies are more than 5 years old. Quite simply, for 5 year land supply purposes the output of the standard methodology should be used.

Section 15: Conserving and enhancing the natural environment

Paragraph 177 has been amended in response to the People Against Wind judgement. It now makes clear that the presumption in favour of sustainable development is disapplied only where an appropriate assessment has concluded that there is no suitable mitigation strategy in place.

“The presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply where the plan or project is likely to have a significant effect on a habitats site (either alone or in combination with other plans or projects), unless an appropriate assessment has concluded that there will be no adverse effect from the plan or project on the integrity of the habitats site.”

Definition of ‘Deliverable’

The definition has been ‘tidied up’ rather than amended or tightened. This is intended to end the speculation around the meaning of the word that arose largely on the back of the Woolpit decision (APP/W3520/W/18/3194926).

Specific clarification has been provided in respect of the way in which small sites and sites without detailed consent should be assessed to conclude on their deliverability.

It now reads as follows:

“Deliverable: To be considered deliverable, sites for housing should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular:

a)  sites which do not involve major development and have planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years (for example because they are no longer viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans).

b)  where a site has outline planning permission for major development, has been allocated in a development plan, has a grant of permission in principle, or is identified on a brownfield register, it should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years.”

19 Feb 2019

Government Response to Technical Consultation

The Government has also published its response to the October 2018 Technical Consultation on Updates to National Planning Policy and Guidance. This confirms that the Government considers the 2014-based projections provide the appropriate approach for establishing the demographic baseline for the standard method. It also confirms the changes to paragraph 177 and the definition of ‘deliverable’ now taken forward in the revised NPPF.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/779792/LHN_Gov_response.pd

19 Feb 2019

Housing Delivery Test Results Published

Also, on the 19th February 2019, the Government published the long-awaited results of its Housing Delivery Test. The test, which assesses whether local planning authorities are delivering sufficient new homes for their area, compares the net homes delivered over three years to the homes that should have built over the same period (their housing requirement). It is presented as a percentage with 95% representing a ‘pass’.

Across England, the test concluded that 108 councils and planning authorities failed to meet the pass rate – about a third of the total - while 206 councils and five joint local plan areas delivered at least 95 per cent of their assessed need. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/housing-delivery-test-2018-measurement

19 Feb 2019

Permitted Development Changes

Housing secretary James Brokenshire confirmed key changes to Permitted Development (PD) rights, that were first consulted on in Autumn 2018, as part of the Spring Statement including:

  • Upwards Extensions: PD right to extend certain buildings upwards to deliver additional homes will be introduced with regulations in the Autumn.
  • High Street Changes: PD right for town centre uses (A1, A2, A5, betting shops, pay day loan shops and launderettes) to change to officers (B1) and takeaways to change to residential use. Expected to be brought in in the spring or autumn.
  • Household Rear Extensions: The temporary increase in PD extensions from 4m to 8m for detached properties and 3m to 6m for other dwellings that was due to expire at the end of May will be made permanent in the spring with an additional fee added for the required prior approval application.
  • Storage  to Resi PD Right to End: The temporary right for changes of use from storage to residential will not be extended and will lapse on 10 June.

A PD right to allow commercial buildings to be demolished and replaced with homes is still being considered and the Government has also committed to reviewing all PD rights for residential conversions in response to concerns over the quality of housing created.

19 Feb 2019

Inspector Clarifies Evidence Needed to Demonstrate Housing Land Supply

In a recent appeal decision at Bures Hamlet in Braintree District (APP/Z1510/W/18/3207509) an Inspector has reviewed the Woolmer and Woolpit decisions providing further useful guidance in the assessment of 5 year housing land supply.  He found that:

  • Permissions issued after the base date should not be counted (including sites subject to a resolution to grant – paragraph 62)
  • Information received after the base-date regarding the progress of sites with outline permission should be included in the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) (paragraph 63).
  • An authority must demonstrate not only that some housing completions will begin on site within five-years but also the amount of housing that will be delivered within that five-year period (paragraph 65).
  • The clear evidence relied upon must either be included in the AMR or be published alongside it (paragraph 66-67).

29 Nov 2018

The National Planning Policy Framework (2018)

The long awaited revised NPPF was published on 24th July 2018 alongside several supporting documents. The document retains a pro-growth stance, continuing to place its emphasis on the Government’s objective of significantly boosting housing supply in order to meet the target of building 300,000 new homes a year by the mid 2020s.

The revised document is now beginning to have an impact in practice with some policies having been tested through planning appeals. As a result we believe the following elements can offer enhanced opportunities for our clients:

Housing Delivery

  • There is an increased emphasis on the delivery of housing with the introduction of the Housing Delivery Test (commencing November 2018) and a new definition of ‘Deliverable’ in the glossary. The latter now requires Councils to demonstrate through clear and robust evidence that housing development will begin on site within 5 years. As a result a number of Council’s housing land supply positions have been challenged with Inspectors finding in favour of appellants allowing residential development in the context of the presumption of sustainable development where previously it would have been resisted.

Affordable Housing

  • Councils are now encouraged to promote a new form of ‘entry-level exceptions site’ specifically providing homes suitable for first time buyers on unallocated sites adjacent to existing settlements. These sites are to be no more than one hectare in size or the development should not exceed 5% of the size of the existing settlement (does not apply in National Parks, the AONB or Green Belt). Unlike traditional rural exception sites however, there is no mention of the land being used for affordable housing in perpetuity meaning that theoretically there could be potential for a future change to market housing. Furthermore Councils are able to consider an ‘element of market housing’ in order to help facilitate landowners bringing sites forward for development. This therefore offers potential for small sites to come forward in the short term.
  • A subtle change to green belt policy now allows for residential development that contributes to local affordable housing on brownfield green belt sites, so long as it does not cause ‘substantial harm’ to green belt openness. This test has been established as a ‘high bar’ in a recent appeal decision. In essence, this provides a somewhat more flexible approach for the redevelopment of previously developed sites in the green belt than before as long as affordable housing is included and the harm to the green belt would not amount to being ‘substantial.

Small and Medium Sites

  • Councils must now ensure that at least 10% of the sites allocated for housing in their plans are of 0.5ha or less to help diversify opportunities for housebuilders. This therefore unlocks smaller and medium sites which may have previously lacked policy support and offers enhanced opportunities for land promotion through Local Plans.

Please contact our team to discuss further how the revised NPPF could assist you.

29 Nov 2018

Consultation description

The government is committed to simplifying and speeding up the planning system, to support the high street, make effective use of land and deliver more homes.

Building on existing planning reforms, the government is consulting on proposals that will allow greater change of use to support high streets to adapt and diversify, support extending existing buildings upwards to create additional homes, and speed up the delivery of new homes.

The consultation includes separate proposals in respect of:

  • Part 1: new and amended permitted development rights and changes to use classes, including to support the regeneration of the high street and to extend existing buildings upwards to create new homes.
  • Part 2: the disposal of surplus local authority land - rationalising and updating the rules which govern disposal of public land at less than best value.
  • Part 3: a draft listed building consent order to support the work of the Canal & River Trust.
  • Part 4: draft guidance on the compulsory purchase powers of new town development corporations

Read more here